Judge Judy – Children taken away by CPS pt. 2

August 9, 2010 by Adoption Information and Laws  
Filed under Fostering & Orphanages

WP Greet Box icon
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.

 

Judge Judy
Video Rating: 5 / 5

 

Speech on the ills of the family court and ways to combat this problem through action.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Adoption Information and Laws

Comments

32 Responses to “Judge Judy – Children taken away by CPS pt. 2”

  1. fatsomamacheese on August 9th, 2010 9:13 am

    “It was probably august, november of 07…” lol, that’s like a range of 4 months…she’s an idiot.

  2. Vanessas1969 on August 9th, 2010 9:52 am

    Why was she able to have another child after smothering one? You kill your child and you should have your uterus taken out. No more children for you EVER!
    My heart goes out to those children, and all the future ones she pumps out and gets taken away. Hopefully they are taken before something awful happens to them and are young enough to have decent lives.
    Children are a privilege, not a right.

  3. Blackwolfpt on August 9th, 2010 10:49 am

    At 2:34 it looks like Byrd is falling asleep!

  4. Tubedoll on August 9th, 2010 11:49 am

    wow. white people are truly evil…

  5. MissIlziite on August 9th, 2010 11:54 am

    Plaintiffs black eyes are scaring me…

  6. lemmecugetloose on August 9th, 2010 12:34 pm

    There is sooooo much more to this case then what is being said!!! I think that fat plaintiff and her fat witness was telling a fat lie!! I believe the defendant when she said the brother asked for the money! i totally believe that!! I believe the defendant lied about who the father was and when they found out thats why they sued her…but its some untold truths in this case…

  7. PLURRingo on August 9th, 2010 12:48 pm

    WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT BITCH SMILING ABOUT?

  8. LadyGillian on August 9th, 2010 1:44 pm

    Soo, defendant allows estrange SIL pay her legal fees so she can get her kid back, has no problem about having the wrong man named as father of her child, has been in and out of jail herself a couple of times, had a drug problem, has lost legal custody of two kids and her father is proud of her? She HAS to take parenting classes and get drug checks frequently.

    pray tell me, whatever for? I would think that shame or embarrassment would be a more appropriate emotion regarding her.

  9. CaliberRT15 on August 9th, 2010 1:52 pm

    everyone here needs Jesus….except judge Judy

  10. mischief4911 on August 9th, 2010 2:33 pm

    @bonniekilty I agree that it was the plantiff trying to get a reaction from jj and the gallery and garner some sympathy for her own heart-break, but it does have alot to do with the case in reality. If she has indeed been clean for 3 yrs at the time of the taping she would have been sober thru her pregnancy & post-partum period. That means there were other factors the authorities were concerned enough about to remove the baby. Maunchausen by Proxy is dangerous mental disorder .

  11. healthya540mg5959 on August 9th, 2010 2:35 pm

    i wish the mother luck… she did seem somewhat sincere
    if she f’ks up again and has hell break loose again, she’ll commit suicide.
    Her abomination to who the parent of the child is unacceptable, though…. in that way… WHORE!

  12. mrbucket1100 on August 9th, 2010 3:08 pm

    as much as both of the children are better off with other parents, i feel very sorry for this woman. she has obviously been through alot and its obvious that shes trying not to burst out into tears. i really hope that she gets her shit together and gets the chance to become a good parent.

  13. nudest101 on August 9th, 2010 3:24 pm

    @Traci25 The smile is a defense mechanism. Who wouldn’t be embarrassed to go into court and have someone tell the world that you are a bad mother? We’d have to be more concerned if she just stood there with no emotions. I hope she’s getting psychological help because she is in regression – 26 year olds should not speak like 5 year olds.

  14. Traci25 on August 9th, 2010 3:53 pm

    The defendant really needs to wipe that smile off her damn face. What is she so happy about? Oh wait, it must be the fact that her children got taken away from her. Yeah, I can definitely see the humor there. *end sarcasm*

  15. RemoteMemory on August 9th, 2010 4:27 pm

    the child is better off not knowing that mother I am sorry to say

  16. kazooga1234 on August 9th, 2010 4:33 pm

    @waninoko87 cept that its mostly chirstains that end up beating their children so i would say no dont do that (after all i should no i was one of them)

  17. Aloverssoulz on August 9th, 2010 4:55 pm

    @waninoko87 No.

  18. waninoko87 on August 9th, 2010 5:09 pm

    These people need to find the lord.

  19. eDrifter1 on August 9th, 2010 5:40 pm

    @martsutube
    moron.

  20. Cloudshocked on August 9th, 2010 6:38 pm

    The child is innocent. I believe the Plaintiff was merely trying to give her niece a better chance in life from what her brother & sister in law could give her.

  21. smidi1974 on August 9th, 2010 7:16 pm

    It is a very sad case but I do hope that the Defendant does turn her life around…but she is going to need help for a long long time

  22. lucidparody on August 9th, 2010 7:20 pm

    It seems like the D is making lots of progress to be a better person

  23. wildernesswandering2 on August 9th, 2010 7:25 pm

    Judge Judy is not a real judge. She is an actress and her court room is a telivision studio; her chambers is a studio dressing room. She has no authority other than what YOU give to her. She is a temporary seclorum judge, nevertheless.

  24. motionandRest on August 9th, 2010 7:48 pm

    God be with Natasha and help her

  25. judewishedhimselfout on August 9th, 2010 8:23 pm

    And people wonder why the world is so efffed up! With parents like this kids don’t have a chance to live a normal life and then they in turn get just as screwed up as their idiotic parents and the cycle continues.

  26. bobbyleejohnson on August 9th, 2010 8:42 pm

    I do not agree with stop paying child support I do agree the friend of the court needs reform..

  27. ICSTRINGS on August 9th, 2010 9:17 pm

    I agree stop paying child support. We need civil disobedience.

  28. onlylexus on August 9th, 2010 10:08 pm

    organise with me, im doing something, will you dads help me, if so contact me pauldmanningat blue yonder. co . uk no spaces, you can work that out surely! Come on Dads lets get some justice.? Im trying to start a fathers group here in Yorkshire area, help me! paul

  29. sfordgg on August 9th, 2010 10:49 pm

    very well said, the system has been hijacked by special interest groups.

  30. jasontanis on August 9th, 2010 11:05 pm

    Amen, if fathers don’t unite we will continue to lose our children and accept child support slavery.
    Equal rights for fathers. End court ordered child support, get the government out of our homes.

  31. dunisback on August 9th, 2010 11:09 pm

    There is something you should know. This system has evolved into a muti billion dollar slave trade. Men are slaves to the system, no rights, no say, just bills from the lawyers and child support.

    The lawyers are not working for men. They are using the kids to create confrontation with the women, to make more money for themselves.

    The only way out is for men everywhere and at the same time, to stop paying child support untill the system is made fair for all. Its all about the money..

  32. SpLiTnTwO on August 9th, 2010 11:40 pm

    Great job Mike…. Keep up the great work!

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes